Gender? I Hardly Know 'Er!

Some people seem to think that i need to write a blog.

Some people are very pushy.

Some people are about to get what they asked for.


Introduction:

A few years ago in Upstate New York, i discovered a strange siddur lying around the shul. I picked it up and flipped through it, and came across the beginning of the Shemoneh ‘Esreih prayer (known for short to its friends as the ‘Amida). There was the usual introductory verse from Psalms. The first blessing, mentioning the Patriarchs.

And then, the following directions...
(drumroll, please)
in the winter, say:
mashiv haruahh umorid hageshem
([God] makes the wind blow and brings down rain)
in the summer, say:
mashiv haruahh umorid hatal
([God] makes the wind blow and brings down dew)

The following thoughts went through my head:
1. What the hell?
2. Hey, that's my family's custom!

a brief explanatory note: why is this weird? well, there are two common customs when it comes to the beginning of the second blessing of the ‘Amida. the general Ashkenazic custom is to only say the winter text (during the winter, of course); there is no equivalent text for the summer. the general Sefardic custom is to say the same winter text, but a shorter summer text: morid hatal. no one, as far as i had ever heard, aside from my family and possibly some small sect of hhasidim somewhere, say the same exact text during both the rainy and dry seasons, with just switching the type of precipitation mentioned between 'rain' and 'dew'.

And so i was introduced to Sidur Eizor Eiliyahu — a prayerbook of the Eastern Ashkenazic tradition, according to the style of Rabbi Eiliyahu the Ga’on of Vilna. When i came to Israel, and the friendly sforimmonger stopped by my yeshiva, I bought a copy of my own.


Rising Action:

According to the editors of Sidur Eizor Eiliyahu, what they were trying to do was to get as close as possible to the text that the GR"A used to daven. They did this both by studying his known customs and opinions on the matter of individual prayers or textual variants, and by reconstructing the basic text of the prayerbook as it was during his time. Usually, whenever they, therefore, deviate from the commonly accepted text of today, they put a footnote explaining why. Sometimes they kept the contemporary text, but described in footnotes the older formulations that they had found in their research.

Some of the things they found:
1. The ‘Aleinu prayer used to end with Hashem yimlokh le‘olam va‘ed — the additional line we have today, Vene’emar..., was added at earliest in 5457, based on the AR"Y, the Kabbalist Rabbi Yitzhhaq Luria of Safed.
2. The psalm Ledavid Mizmor said when returning the Torah to the ark is not found in old sidurim.
3. The ending blessing of Pesuqey Dezimra, Yishtabahh, ends ...melekh eil hhai (rhymes with "sky") ha‘olamim in all old siddurs, but was changed to ...hhey... under influence of the AR"Y.
4. Footnote for the morning blessing "[thank you God] for not making me a goy (nation/gentile)" — "So it is in the Ketav Yad siddur [a qabbalistic siddur commentary attributed to the GR"A], and so it is in many old siddurim... but according to Bei’ur HaGR"A it seems that it was [the GR"A]'s opinion to say "[thank you God] for having made me a yisra’eil (israelite/jew)" as is found in many other old siddurim; and Yitzhhaq Satanov decided to change it to "...for not having made me a nokhri (stranger/foreigner/gentile)" and [other siddur-writing rabbis] followed in his footsteps (and not because of the Censors).

Interesting, no?
Well, at least i think so...
If that didn't impress/shock you, how about this?


Climax:

A person should always fear heaven in secret, and admit the truth, and speak truth in his heart, and wake up early and say:
Master of all worlds, it is not upon our righteousness that we cast our pleas before you, but on your abundant mercy. What are we, our lives, our lovingkindness, our justice, our salvation, our power, our might? What can we say before you, God our God and God of our ancestors — since all the heroes are nothing before you, and the men of great reputation as if never having been, and the wise as without knowledge, and the understanding as without intelligence; for the majority of their works are emptiness, and the days of their lives are vapor before you, and the advantage of human over animal is nothing, for all is vapor.
But we are your nation, your contract-mates, the children of Avraham who loved you...

The Footnote Says:
Ohavkha ״אוֹהַבְךָ״ (who loved you) — The beit with a sheva’ and the kaf with a qamatz ״בְךָ״ , in the masculine gender, according to Rabbi Shabtai Sofeir's vowel-marking, but in all of the old siddurim it was marked ohavakh ״אוהבָךְ״ ... And so it is in many other places, and it is according to the Aramaic pattern in which the distinction between masculine and feminine is neutralized... But Maharshal [Rabbi Shelomoh Luria] and Rashas [the aforementioned Rabbi Shabtai Sofeir], and all the siddurim after them, have already agreed to amend [the text] and write in every place in [exclusively] masculine terminology, for one should not address the Holy One Blessèd Is He in terms which are equally masculine and feminine (i.e. 'epicene' as the linguists call it)...


Denouement:

I saw this mentioned in the Mail.Jewish listserv archives, and sent an email to the mentioner. A talmid hhakham named Lipman, who was also nice enough to explain my Yiddish tagline to Godol Hador, scanned in a few pages from the newly-printed edition of Rashas's siddur, including the part the editors of Siddur Eizor Eiliyahu quoted, and sent them to me.

So wrote Rabbi Shabtai Sofeir...
...And since this form is epicene, it isn't proper to speak so to God, to compare him to the feminine, as if to say [as the saying goes] "his strength is sapped like a female" God forbid! And especially, this [epicene form] is not found in the entire Scripture in relation to God, possibly for this reason, except for [a number of exceptions he goes on to explain]...


Fin:

My Rationalist Yekke/Litvak Modern-Orthodox upbringing says:
God is neither male nor female!

The Ever-So-Popular Cabbalists say:
God is both masculine(ish) and feminine(ish)!

So... what's up with this stuff?

Who supports me in my quest to Bring Back The Pseudo-Epicene -Akh, which, after all, was the standard masculine ending in Mishnaic Hebrew, the dialect in which our prayers were composed?
Who thinks i'm a heretic for prefering the earlier authorities to the later ones?
Who wants to enter the anthropomorpheminist (get it?) minefield of attributing sex/gender characteristics to God?

The comments are open and ready for business...

(here ends the first true blog post of the goblin king)

We Have A Winner

As the votes stand now, on Sunday, the 6th of Iyar, 5765 — May 15th, 2005, a winner has been declared in my search for a new picture. I have tallied up the responses, both here and at DovBear's place, and come to the following conclusions:

Picture #1 (The Formal Headshot) — While it might be fun to portray myself as a member of the politburo or the KGB, i am not nor have i ever been a "Mir bochur" or a "total greased out frummy".

Picture #2 (Up A Hharuv Tree) — This picture got no negative votes whatsoever! On the other hand, it didn't get any positive votes either... And it's a little elongated. I'll use it somewheres else.

Picture #3 (I Cropped Out My Friend Navit) — While I do appreciate the suggestion to crop myself out and leave Navit instead, this picture did get three positive votes!

Picture #4 (Herding Goats Offscreen) — One 'yes' vote, and one 'nerd' vote. Considering the fact that i am somewhat of a nerd, i thought of counting that as a plus; however, even with two votes in its favor, the Herding Goats action shot didn't make the cut.

Picture #5 (Overlooking The Kineret) — I fail to see what the Godol Hador saw in this picture to describe it, too, as nerdy, but it's sort of blurry anyway, and has half an automatic datestamp, so... in the trash it goes.

Hence my new picture.
And that's a wrap.
No more posts on this pseudo-blog / anti-blog / mini-blog of mine.
Really!
Well, maybe one day...
Why do i feel the icy cold grip of the blog-ghost of MoChassid settling over my fingers?

If you feel like throwing in some late votes, they may be taken into consideration.
Thanks for visiting, come back soon, buhbye!
(oh my aching jetlag)

Now You See Me

Heyall, welcome to my empty blog!

I've been hanging around the blogosphere for almost a year now, reading other people's work and periodically making comments in response. And every so often I would get the urge to start a blog of my own. Unfortunately, though, I don't really think I'd have such interesting things to say that it'd be worth it to spend time writing, editing, and maintaining a full-blown blog.

So here is my little pseudo-blog. It's got a bunch of links off to the side, a bit of profile information about me, and not much else.

Here's where y'all come in:
When I made my profile, I put up a picture to go with it. I feel no need to hide behind some kind of Great Wall of China of blogly anonymity, so I decided to go for it and let you all see what I look like. This is the same picture that I've put up in profiles of mine a few other places on the internet, because it's pretty much the best that I've got.

It's got a few pros and a few cons, though.
PROS:
— It's a passport-style head shot, good for a profile!
— My facial expression isn't exceedingly goofy!
— It exudes respectability instead of slackerpunkliness.
CONS:
— It's too formal; I never really dress like that in real life.
— People might pigeonhole or label me inaccurately based on it!
— My brother called it "crappy".

Now, I sometimes actually do respect my brother's judgment calls, and am therefore asking you all what y'all think. Should I stick with this picture? Or should I switch it with something else, for instance one of these?


Picture #1 — The Formal Headshot


Picture #2 — Up A Hharuv Tree


Picture #3 — I Cropped Out My Friend Navit


Picture #4 — Herding Goats (Offscreen)


Picture #5 — Overlooking The Kineret



So, nu? Votes? Opinions? Comments? Flames? Rotten Tomatoes?


[UPDATE!]
My brother has just informed me that "people usually dont put their own picture on their blog; they put up an icon of some sort." Which i guess makes sense... it just sort of ruins the whole idea of saying 'Hey! Look at me! This is who i am!' I guess i could put up a cute little icon of a STEGosaurus... or a Goblin King... or anything which is 'not a šteg / שטעג (="path/way" in Yiddish)'...